浪费了多少食物，因为它看起来有点“怪异”？
畸形，但完全可食用的产品经常被超市拒绝，因为它不符合其外观标准，从而导致食物浪费，而农民的收入却损失。
英国激进主义者和作家Tristram Stuart引起了他所谓的“全球食物垃圾丑闻”的注意，其中包括超市拒绝无吸引力的农产品。根据Stuart，“估计有20％至40％的英国水果和蔬菜在到达商店之前就被拒绝了 - 主要是因为它们与超级市场的过度严格的化妆品标准不符。”
Fortunately, Stuart’s activism has produced some results. Sainsbury’s, a British supermarket chain, announced last year that it would be accepting more aesthetically imperfect vegetables in response to food shortages brought on by 2012’s poor weather conditions. While this move was encouraging, it was temporary. More permanent changes are needed to address the food waste crisis.
2月，斯图尔特帮助主持了dinner与理事会U.N.环境计划（UNEP）在肯尼亚内罗毕，在此期间他进行了食物浪费。在此次活动中，高级的UNEP官员在肯尼亚种植的一顿餐点用餐，以出口出口，但被外国买家拒绝，正如斯图尔特所说的那样，“化妆品的原因”。
作为半岛电视台报告in covering the event, at least 10 to 15 percent of Kenyan produce is rejected by supermarket buyers, and this rejected food rarely ends up being consumed by humans. In fact, some supermarkets have rules mandating that rejected produce go only to animals, and not to people. This is especially outrageous because, according to the World Health Organization, 30 percent of Kenya’s population gets below the minimum level of dietary energy consumption.
As the自然资源国防委员会（NRDC）报告“食物浪费是一个复杂的问题，从'农场到叉子'。”但斯图尔特（Stuart）表现出来，令人信服的超级市场更改其审美标准，以换取良好的产品，这是减少食物浪费的必要步骤。同时，想要尽力而为的消费者可以减少食物浪费尖端来自自然资源国防委员会。
